Flawed Study Knocks Chiropractic
With growing numbers of the public utilizing alternative health methods, you can expect the opponents to try to do whatever is possible to undermine the alternatives. In early October, the New England Journal of Medicine reported a study that compared physical therapy, chiropractic and the reading of a back school booklet, for the care of acute low back pain. The findings are summarized as follows: “Chiropractors are no more effective than physical therapists in treating lower back pain, and both are only marginally successful at easing their patients’ symptoms. This study is quite opposite the findings of most other studies on chiropractic including a 1994 report by the United States Agency for Health Care Policy Research in which it was concluded that relief can be accomplished with spinal adjustments.
As strong appetite suppressants, increasingly serious products and the marketplace has been over saturated, it is difficult to select. We are reviewing the best appetite suppressant to help out you with your choice.
The New England Journal of Medicine study however, had some very flawed methodology. The group of patients with acute low back pain were divided into the three groups but only given care for ONE month. The patient’s condition was then monitored for another 24 months. At the end of the monitoring period they determined that there was no difference in outcomes. HOW ABSURD!
Let’s apply that same methodology to a diet program. Take a group of overweight people and have one group go on a diet for a month, the next group eat vegetarian for a month and the next read. After one month, let them all go back to their usual life-style and 24 months later see if there is any difference. GUESS WHAT? NO CHANGE! This is science?
Don’t let the new stories fool you. One must always get all the facts before making a judgment against chiropractic!